WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
School of Social Work
SOCWRK 365 -- Introduction to Social Work Research
Semester: Fall 2005 Professor: Brandon W. Youker
Class Meets: Tuesday 4:00 to 6:20 Email: brandon_youker@yahoo.com
Class Room #: 2088 CHHS. Cell: (203) 606-1594
Office Hours: by appointment.
Available by email and cell phone. I have no scheduled office hour but am happy to schedule meetings at a convenient time for both of us.
This course is designed to increase students’ knowledge of research as a tool for social work practice. Students will acquire the basic skills and knowledge to utilize existing social research for practice-related decision-making, as well as the capacity to carry out systematic methods of inquiry in the practice setting. The implementation of these research skills will enhance service delivery and contribute to the knowledge base of the profession.
The course is based on a knowing-understanding-doing paradigm. This means that students are expected to demonstrate:
Any student with a documented disability (e.g., physical, learning, psychiatric, vision, hearing, etc.), who needs to arrange reasonable accommodations must contact Disabled Student Resources and Services (http://www.dsrs.wmich.edu/) at the beginning of the semester. A disability determination must be made by this office before any accommodations are provided by the instructor. Ms. Beth denHartigh is the Director of the Center and can be reached by telephone: (269) 387-2120 or email: beth.denHartigh@wmich.edu.
You are responsible for making yourself aware of and understanding the policies and procedures in the Undergraduate (pp. 274-276) or Graduate (pp. 26-28) Catalog that pertain to Academic Integrity. These policies include cheating, fabrication, falsification and forgery, multiple submission, plagiarism, complicity and computer misuse, and can be viewed online by going to http://www.osc.wmich.edu/academicintegrity/catalog.html.
Not only are the infractions of academic dishonesty a violation of university regulations but they are also a serious breach of the ethical code of conduct for the social work profession. If there is a reason to believe you have been involved in academic dishonesty, the Office of Student Conduct will be notified using the procedures outlined in the Guidelines for Instructors. You should consult with me if you are uncertain about an issue of academic honesty prior to the submission of an assignment or examination.
Students are asked to give the course the same consideration as any other professional social work setting, and show both the instructor and their peers the same courtesy as would be expected among professional colleagues.
A) Attendance
In the event that you are unable to attend or will be late for a class session or meeting, you are expected to inform the instructor either by email or phone in advance of the class. It is then your responsibility to seek any information missed.
B) Class Participation
You are expected to contribute to class discussion. Informed disagreement is both anticipated and welcomed. All members of the class are expected to be respectful of the opinions of others and to show courtesy in interactions with each other.
C) Preparation for Class
You are expected to prepare for each class as indicated in
the course schedule. Preparation activity includes but is not limited to
completing reading the assigned readings prior to class, summarizing the content
and being prepared to discuss it, participating in study groups, listing
questions or reactions to the material, and making connections between concepts
in current readings and earlier readings.
D) Course Syllabus
Since the syllabus is the learning contract for the course, it is expected that you read all pages of your course syllabus by the second class session. Give extra attention to the following course pages (all web-based): main, overview, policies, reading list, schedule, assignments, and gradebook. If you have any questions about the course syllabus, ask the instructor at the second class meeting or as soon as they arise (e-mail or phone messages are always welcome.)
Other instructor expectations:
All homework and writing assignments must follow these guidelines.
A) Instructor Feedback and Extra Credit
Students are expected to submit their best work for each course assignment (graded or not) on the scheduled due date. Instructor feedback on earlier drafts of assignments is available up to the date specified in a particular course schedule (usually one week prior to the scheduled due date of the assignment). Check your course schedule for specifics. This timeframe allows students sufficient time to consider and integrate the feedback provided. There will be one small extra-credit opportunity to be determined by the instructor. Re-doing assignments after the due date is not an option in this instructor’s courses. The reasons for this policy are to model expectations of the real-world work environment for the social work professional and to give students the opportunity to develop proactive work/study habits for optimal professional performance. Students are encouraged to get early drafts of assignments to the instructor for feedback prior to grading.
B) Alternate Assignments
If a student has a compelling argument that a particular assignment for the course will significantly disadvantage his/her grade, then he/she may propose an alternative assignment to the instructor. A proposal must be made in writing and submitted to the instructor by the second class meeting (e-mail submissions are acceptable). A separate proposal is required for each assignment being contested, and each proposal must include the following:
· name and number of the course
· name the assignment being contested
· a rationale that clearly explains why the student feels that the particular assignment will disadvantage him or her
· a detailed description of the "proposed" alternate assignment (must cover the same general content of the original assignment)
· proposed new due dates, if applicable
· the student's name (typed), date of proposal, and signature of student
The instructor will judge the quality and reasonableness of the proposal and make a determination of whether or not to accept it by the third class meeting. If the instructor accepts the proposal, then he will add his signature, and provide a signed copy of the proposal to the student for his or her records. The instructor will keep the original proposal.
C) Missed or Late Work
Make-up examinations or assignments, as a rule, will not be
permitted. All assignments are due 30 minutes after the start of the class on
the date due (refer to class schedule), or otherwise as noted in the course
syllabus. Late papers and assignments will not be accepted. Assignments, tests,
or papers not submitted will receive a score of zero. All submissions attempt to
meet professional writing standards and by using the American Psychological
Association (APA) style guide to organize your papers and cite references. For a
brief guide to APA see,
http://www.wmich.edu/library/guides/style/apa.php. Logical paper/report
format, proper grammar, correct spelling, and use of non-biasing language are
all basic elements of professional writing. Students are encouraged to contact
WMU's Writing Center (http://www.wmich.edu/casp/writing_center.htm)
for assistance. The more you read professional or academic writing, the easier
it will become and you will become more familiar with writing standards and
paper formatting.
http://homepages.wmich.edu/~wlacefie/EMR%20Support%20Documentation.htm
*Note: The information presented in this
syllabus does not represent the official statements or views of either
Western Michigan University or the
School of Social Work.
|
Required Reading:
Grinnell, R.M., Urau, Y.A., & Williams, M. (2005). Social Work Research and Evaluation: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (7th Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. (Throughout this course the textbook will be referred to as G & Y)
Davidson, E.J. (2005). Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Suggested Readings:
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Brickman, L. & Rog, D.J. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. |
Final Grade Distribution
|
Grade |
Range |
|
A |
94 - 100 |
|
BA |
88 - 93.9 |
|
B |
82 - 87.9 |
|
CB |
76 - 81.9 |
|
C |
70 - 75.9 |
|
DC |
65 - 69.9 |
|
D |
60 - 64.9 |
|
E |
Less than 60 |
Criteria for the Evaluation of Student Performance:
|
|
Points |
Frequency |
Total |
Percent of Grade |
|
Weekly Homework |
20 |
7 |
140 |
41% |
|
Quizzes |
15 |
3 |
45 |
13% |
|
Proposal Bibliography |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1% |
|
Midterm |
50 |
1 |
50 |
15% |
|
Final |
100 |
1 |
100 |
29% |
|
Extra Credit |
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total Points (not including extra credit) |
340 |
|
||
|
Session |
Date |
Readings |
Homework |
|
1 |
30-Aug |
Chapter 1. |
HM 1--due in 2 wks. |
|
2 |
6-Sep |
Chapter 2-research context, Chapter 3-research ethics, & Chapter 16-interviewing. Skim Chapter 1. |
|
|
3 |
13-Sep |
Chapter 4-using existing knowledge & Chapter 17-surveys. |
HM 1--DUE; HW 2--due in 2 wks. |
|
4 |
20-Sep |
Chapter 5-quantitative research & Chapter 7-gender, ethnicity & race matters |
|
|
5 |
27-Sep |
Chapter 6-qualitative research & Chapter 14-observation |
HM 2--DUE; HW 3--due in 2 wks. |
|
6 |
4-Oct |
Chapter 8-measurement & Chapter 9-measuring instruments |
|
|
7 |
11-Oct |
Chapter 10-designing measurement instruments & Chapter 11-sampling |
Mid Term; HM 3--DUE; HW 4--due in 2 wks. |
|
8 |
18-Oct |
Chapter 12-case-level designs & Chapter 13-group-level designs |
|
|
9 |
25-Oct |
Chapter 18-secondary analysis, Chapter 19-content analysis, & Chapter 20-utilizing existing statistics |
HW 4--DUE; HW 5--due in 2 wks. |
|
10 |
1-Nov |
Chapter 22 selecting a data collection method & data source, Chapter 23-analyzing quantitative data, & Chapter 24-writing quantitative proposals & reports |
|
|
11 |
8-Nov |
Chapter 25-evaluating quantitative research reports, Chapter 26-analyzing qualitative data, & Chapter 27-writing qualitative proposals & reports |
HW 5--DUE; HW 6--due in 2 wks. |
|
12 |
15-Nov |
Chapter 28-reliability and validity in qualitative research, Davidson Chapters 1, 2 & 3. Also pp. 61, 62, 63 |
|
|
13 |
22-Nov |
Davidson Chapters 5, 6 & 7 |
HW 6--DUE; HW 7--due in 1 week. |
|
14 |
29-Nov |
Davidson Chapters 8, 9, & 10 |
Final Exam DUE; HW 7 DUE. |