Teaching Evaluations by Semester (ECON3200):         (Open-ended comments)

Semester

Fall 2011

Fall 2011

Summer 2011

Spring 2011

Fall 2010

Summer 2010

Fall 2009

Summer 2009

Spring 2009

Fall 2008

Spring 2008

Spring 2008

Fall 2007

Fall 2007

Spring 2007

Fall 2006

Summer 2006

Spring 2006

Spring 2006

Fall 2005

Summer 2005

Spring 2005

Spring 2005

Fall 2004

Summer 2004

Spring 2004

Spring 2004

Fall 2003

Course (ECON)

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

3200

Number of Students

52

59

27

62

61

31

55

32

63

56

63

61

56

60

61

61

29

59

59

64

38

60

64

68

39

70

71

70

Class GPA

1.98

2.32

2.72

2.63

2.61

2.89

2.65

2.78

2.30

2.24

2.21

2.34

2.32

2.35

2.14

2.21

2.17

2.04

1.91

2.15

2.28

2.41

2.16

2.36

2.95

2.54

2.38

2.81

ITEM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rate the instructor’s overall teaching effectiveness.

4.00

4.08

4.67

4.00

4.38

4.5

4.1

N/A

4.3

3.9

4.0

4.0

3.7

3.8

3.7

3.9

N/A

3.9

3.9

3.7

N/A

3.3

4.0

3.4

N/A

3.8

3.5

3.6

Rate the overall quality of this course.

3.80

3.77

5

4.00

4.14

4.5

4.1

N/A

4.2

4.0

3.9

4.1

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.9

N/A

4.0

3.6

3.8

N/A

3.3

4.0

3.2

N/A

3.7

3.6

3.5

How much have you learned in this course?

4.40

4.15

5

4.36

4.48

4.25

4.2

N/A

4.2

4.1

3.8

4.0

3.7

3.7

3.4

3.9

N/A

3.8

3.8

3.7

N/A

3.2

3.9

3.2

N/A

3.5

3.6

3.2

Was the grading system for this course explained?

4.80

4.54

5

4.64

4.36

5

4.3

N/A

4.7

4.4

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.4

4.5

4.4

N/A

4.4

4.3

4.5

N/A

4.5

4.6

4.5

N/A

4.9

4.5

4.7

The instructor seemed well prepared for classes.

5.00

4.92

5

4.86

4.86

5

4.5

N/A

4.8

4.7

4.7

4.6

4.6

4.7

4.6

4.4

N/A

4.6

4.4

4.5

N/A

4.1

4.6

4.4

N/A

4.5

4.3

4.5

The instructor promoted an atmosphere conductive to work and learning.

4.80

4.62

5

4.64

4.64

5

4.4

N/A

4.7

4.3

4.3

4.5

4.3

4.3

4.0

4.1

N/A

4.5

4.1

4.3

N/A

3.3

4.4

3.9

N/A

4.1

4.0

4.0

Do you feel course objectives were accomplished?

4.40

4.54

5

4.46

4.33

4.75

4.4

N/A

4.3

4.1

4.3

4.3

4.1

4.0

3.9

4.1

N/A

4.3

3.8

4.1

N/A

3.6

4.3

3.6

N/A

4.0

3.8

3.8

The instructor was a good classroom leader.

4.40

4.69

5

4.62

4.55

5

4.4

N/A

4.4

4.5

4.3

4.2

4.2

4.1

4.2

4.2

N/A

4.5

4.0

4.1

N/A

3.5

4.4

3.8

N/A

4.2

3.9

4.1

Was the instructor able to explain difficult material to your satisfaction?

4.20

3.92

5

4.21

4.41

5

3.9

N/A

4.0

4.0

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.6

3.7

3.9

N/A

4.2

3.9

3.9

N/A

3.4

4.1

3.2

N/A

3.9

3.2

3.8

How accessible was the instructor for student conferences about the course?

4.80

4.62

5

4.71

4.45

4.5

4.3

N/A

4.6

4.3

4.5

4.5

4.2

4.4

4.2

4.3

N/A

4.0

4.1

4.1

N/A

3.7

4.2

3.9

N/A

4.3

4.1

4.4

 Rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor (high 5 low 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 4.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 The workload for the course was (light 5 heavy 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 2.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 The instructor was receptive to student questions (high 5 low 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 4.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 Exams/papers reflected materials covered (great 5 little 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 3.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Grading procedures for the course were (fair 5 unfair 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

How enthusiastic was the instructor about teaching? (very 5 no 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.6

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Teaching Evaluations by Semester (ECON2020 and others)

Semester

Summer 2010

Summer 2009

Summer 2008

Summer 2007

Summer 2007

Fall 2006

Summer 2005

Summer 2005

Summer 2004

Spring 2011

Spring 2009

Spring 2007

Fall 2010

Fall 2005

Fall 2009

Fall 2008

Fall 2004

Fall 2003

Course (ECON)

2020

2020

2020

2020

2020

2020

2020

2020

2020

6760

6760

6760

6990

6990

6860

6860

6860

6860

Number of Students

39

34

34

41

30

174

58

52

55

6

6

9

10

12

5

11

9

5

Class GPA

2.33

2.67

1.94

2.40

2.30

2.24

2.18

2.17

2.36

3.83

3.33

3.44

3.9

3.67

3.6

3.55

2.94

4.00

ITEM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rate the instructor’s overall teaching effectiveness.

4.75

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.7

4.2

4.8

4.2

5.0

4.3

4.7

5.0

Rate the overall quality of this course.

4.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.8

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.7

4.1

4.8

4.0

5.0

4.3

4.4

4.8

How much have you learned in this course?

4.75

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.8

4.3

4.8

3.8

4.8

4.2

4.8

4.8

Was the grading system for this course explained?

4.75

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.3

4.6

5.0

4.3

4.8

4.5

4.6

4.8

The instructor seemed well prepared for classes.

5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

5.0

4.4

5.0

4.7

5.0

4.5

5.0

5.0

The instructor promoted an atmosphere conductive to work and learning.

5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.8

4.1

5.0

4.2

5.0

4.3

4.6

4.8

Do you feel course objectives were accomplished?

5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.3

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

5.0

4.3

5.0

4.1

5.0

4.3

4.5

5.0

The instructor was a good classroom leader.

5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.2

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.8

4.1

5.0

4.2

5.0

4.5

4.9

5.0

Was the instructor able to explain difficult material to your satisfaction?

4.75

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

4.8

4.0

4.8

4.3

5.0

4.3

4.8

4.8

How accessible was the instructor for student conferences about the course?

4.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.6

N/A

N/A

N/A

5.0

5.0

4.6

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.5

4.9

5.0

 Rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor (high 5 low 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 2.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 The workload for the course was (light 5 heavy 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 2.7

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 The instructor was receptive to student questions (high 5 low 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 3.7

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 Exams/papers reflected materials covered (great 5 little 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 3.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Grading procedures for the course were (fair 5 unfair 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

How enthusiastic was the instructor about teaching? (very 5 no 1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A