|
Teaching and Critical Pedagogy
|
|
|
|
Your entries should be thoughtful and respond to the ideas of other students. Reading student entries and responding to others is as important as entering your own responses. Previous experience indicates this requires a regular time commitment of at least 30 minutes per week - perhaps even more. II. Assessment: Assessment will work this way: you will be required to print off your responses/on line conversations that you have during the semester. You will submit these responses in a THREE-RING BINDER: a portfolio reflecting your work for the semester. You should organize your responses in SEQUENTIAL ORDER, from the first entry to the last. And, you must have HEADER INFORMATION i.e. the question, its posting date, the date you responded, etc. Failing to do any of these things will affect your grade. I have provided a rubric at the bottom of the page to give you a better idea of what I will be looking for when I assess your NICENET responses. NOTE: It is important to start early and keep up with the conference. It is assumed that you will respond to all of the questions, and that you will keep up with the conference each week. By "week," I expect students to respond to posted questions within a week - SEVEN DAYS - of their original posting date. For example, a question is posted on Monday morning. You would then have until the end of Sunday to answer the posted question. After that, your work will be considered LATE and your answer (or answers) will NOT count as an official posting. Certainly, you can respond as much as you want DURING the week but at the very least you are expected to answer the posted questions on a week-to-week basis. Ultimately: you will be assessed on active and critical participation in the forum for the ENTIRE semester. You will be expected to respond to each question, and expected to enter into exchanges with other participants on a weekly basis. All of the questions on this forum are NOT to be considered a series of "short answer essay questions" that you can do at any time. The posted questions directly relate to weekly classroom discussions. Therefore, routinely answering questions late and/or skipping the forum altogether helps little when it comes to this class or to advancing the critical discourse necessary to making this course successful. Plus, missing or skipping questions could/will also affect your grade a great deal. Other things: Use professional manners, while being informal at the same time. Don't "flame" other people's responses -- it is often a good idea to reread an entire item before reacting too quickly to an upsetting comment from another student. (Be mindful of how this electronic conference format extends our discussions because you may want to consider on-line communities for your own teaching using an on-line resource such as Nicenet.org). STEP 1 : GET REGISTERED (You will only do this step the first time you join the class.)
STEP 2: LOG INTO ICA (This is how you log in once you have joined the class.)
"NICENET" Portfolio Holistic Rubric An "outstanding, exceptional, extraordinary" grade of "A" for your "NICENET” Portfolio requires that the student meets/exceeds the expectations based in part on the following holistic criteria. Again, when assessing the portfolio you will be assessed on the 'whole' and not solely on the merit of individual pieces. An "outstanding, exceptional, extraordinary" grade of "A" : Means that the student meets/exceeds the expectations based in part on the following holistic criteria:
A "very good/high pass" grade of "B" means : that the student might meet the requirements, but still lacks in some of the more critical areas reflective of "A" quality work. For example: perhaps one, possibly two postings are missing/late; perhaps some of the content of the postings is clearly better than others; generally there seems to be an attempt to engage and interact with the spirit of the assignment, and for the most part the student does a pretty good job when it comes to addressing the key criteria of the assignment. An "adequate/acceptable" grade of "C" means: that the assignment likely meets some of the criteria/requirements, but leaves too many questions regarding postings, timing, quality, critical thinking, analysis. For example: a handful of postings could be late/missing (up to 3); inconsistent week to week in regard to being on time and/or with thought for content of postings; maybe some hint of ‘waiting ‘til the last minute' with a few postings and/or not giving some questions the thought they deserve on a week to week basis; quite obvious that just enough was done for this assignment; more often than not, content is general, simple answers showing little thought. A "D" grade likely reflects: considerable problems and/or poor quality of work, postings, content. For example: student did not post consistently; more postings tend to be late than on time; possibly, there are many postings missing/late altogether (could be 3 to 4); taken as a whole, the content tends to be very vague and/or superficial; the portfolio as a whole shows little thought as a whole for the spirit of the assignment from start to finish; assignment shows lack of effort and/or lack of engagement with the spirit of the assignment. An "E" reflects : a considerable amount of problems, most notably: postings not complete and/or portfolio is missing questions altogether (for example, 60% or less answered; 40% missing, etc.); consistently late postings and/or 'waiting until the last minute' to do the assignment; portfolio littered with very general/vague responses; it is quite obvious that assignment was done ‘at the last minute for a grade,' a last ditch attempt to make up for not participating or engaging the assignment during the course and during the semester.
___________________________________________________ |
|
|
|