WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
Political Science 697 Dr. Gunther M. Hega
Winter 1999 Office: Friedmann 3406
Monday, 5:00-5:50 p.m. Tel.: 616-387-5885
Dunbar 3214 E-mail: hega@wmich.edu
Office hours: M. & W. 11:00-12:00 noon, M. 4:00-5:00 p.m., Tu. 5:00-6:00 p.m., and by appointment
Proposal Workshop
This workshop is designed to introduce students to "the art" of writing a research proposal. During the course of the workshop, each student will develop a dissertation proposal (and attending grant proposals, where appropriate). While this will be done primarily in conjunction with the student’s thesis committee or major advisor, the workshop will provide a weekly support structure in which students will discuss the research question, research design, progress and any complications. The weekly sessions will be based on students presenting their own proposals in the making, and reading and critiquing the proposals of fellow students.
The objective of this course is for students to learn how to develop their own research project, from identifying a research question, reviewing the relevant literature, selecting the appropriate theories, formulating hypotheses, collecting data, choosing the method(s) of analysis, reformulating concepts and theories, to how to best present their results. We will read a guide to writing a generic research proposal and discuss selected examples of how to design a research project in the social sciences. Throughout the course, we will discuss specific examples of "good" research design taken from academic journals and monographs, and explore important theoretical, methodological, and practical issues in designing qualitative and quantitative social inquiry. Most importantly, students will develop their own research project and proposal, present it to their peers, and discuss the merits and weaknesses of their own and others’ proposals. By the end of the semester, students will have proposals in hand to submit to their dissertation committee, a research funding agency, or a professional conference.
Required Books (to be purchased)
Locke, Lawrence F., Waneen Wyrick Spirduso, and Stephen J. Silverman. 1993. Proposals That Work. A Guide for Planning Dissertations and Grant Proposals. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Recommended Books (on reserve in Waldo Library)
Johnson, Janet Buttolph and Richard Joslyn. 1995. Political Science Research Methods, 3rd Ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Cantor, Jeffrey A. 1993. A Guide to Academic Writing. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1970 [repr. 1985]. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing.
Ragin, Charles. 1994. Constructing Social Research. The Unity and Diversity of Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Rudestam, Kjell Erik and Newton, Rae R. 1992. Surviving Your Dissertation. A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Reading assignments will be drawn from the required books, occasionally from the recommended materials, and from journal articles that will be made available as the course progresses. Copies of the required books are available for purchase at the WMU Bookstore; recommended books and articles are placed on reserve in Waldo Library and in the library of the Department of Political Science in Friedmann 3301.
Course Requirements
This course is offered on a credit/no credit basis. That means if you attain a grade of B or better you will receive credit, and a lesser grade means no credit. Grades will be based on four aspects of students' work: participation in class discussions, weekly writing assignments, presentation of research proposals in progress, and the quality of the final thesis proposal at the end of the semester.
Participation in class discussion, weekly writing assignments, presentation of the research project, and writing a qualitative or quantitative research proposal are integral and important parts of this course. As such, your grade will reflect all four. The relative weight assigned to each of these course requirements is:
Class Participation .............................................................20%
Writing Assignments..........................................................50%
Oral Project Presentation....................................................10%
Final Research Proposal.....................................................20%
Class Schedule
Jan. 4: Session 1
Jan. 11: Session 2
Jan. 18: Martin Luther King Day—no class
Jan. 25: Session 3
Feb. 1: Session 4
Feb. 8: Session 5
Feb. 15: Session 6
Feb. 22: Session 7 Draft Proposal due
March 1: Semester Break—no class
March 8: Session 8
March 15: Session 9
March 22: Session 10
March 29: Session 11
April 5: Session 12
April 12: Session 13
April 19: Final Proposal due
Reading Assignments
Unless instructed otherwise, you are expected to have the following assigned readings read prior to the session indicated and be ready to discuss them in class. Readings in italics are recommended. Books are on reserve in Waldo Library; articles are available on the course-material shelf in the Political Science Department Library in Friedmann 3401.
1. Session: Introduction to the Course
2. Session: Selecting a "Puzzle"
Writing assignment 1: Select a sample of research questions and provide rationale for their investigation
Locke, Ch. 1 and 2
Rudestam and Newton, Ch. 1 and 2
3. Session: Reviewing the Literature
Writing assignment 2: Identify and review relevant literature
Locke, Ch. 3 and 4
Rudestam and Newton, Ch. 4
Johnson and Joslyn, Ch. 6
4. Session: Formulating Hypotheses
Writing assignment 3: Formulate falsifiable hypotheses
Johnson and Joslyn, Ch. 3
Rudestam and Newton, Ch. 3
5. Session: Evaluating Theories
Writing assignment 4: Summarize relevant theory
Locke, Ch. 5 and 6
Johnson and Joslyn, Ch. 1 and 2
Przeworski and Teune, Introduction, Ch. 1-4, pp. 3-87
6. Session: Research Design--Data Sampling and Collection
Writing assignment 5: Select cases and method of data collection
Johnson and Joslyn, Ch. 5 and 7
Rudestam and Newton, Ch. 5
Przeworski and Teune, Ch. 5-6, pp. 91-134
7. Session: Research Design--Using A Qualitative vs. Quantitative Approach?
Writing assignment 6: Draft proposal (topic, hypothesis, literature review, data and methods)
King, Keohane, and Verba. 1994, Ch. 1-6
"The Qualitative-Quantitative Disputation: Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research." American Political Science Review, 89, no. 2, June 1995, 454-481
8. Session: Research Design--Selecting a Method of Analysis and Testing your Hypotheses
Writing assignment 7: Describe specific methods and interpretation of results
Oral Presentation, based on proposal outline
Johnson and Joslyn, Ch. 8-12
9. Session: Presenting Your Research
Writing assignment 8: Identify, list and describe conferences appropriate for your research and their proposal deadlines
Oral Presentation, based on proposal outline
Locke, Ch. 7
Cantor, Ch. 6
Rudestam and Newton, Ch. 6
10. Session: Getting Funded
Writing assignment 9: Identify, list and describe funding agencies appropriate for your research
Oral Presentation, based on proposal outline
Locke, Ch. 8 and 9
Cantor, Ch. 7
11. Session: Publishing your Research
Writing assignment 10: Identify, list and describe academic journals appropriate for your research
Oral Presentation, based on proposal outline
Cantor, Ch. 1 - 3
Johnson and Joselyn, Ch. 14
Rudestam and Newton, Ch. 9
12. Session: Writing for Journals
Oral Presentation, based on proposal outline
Cantor, Ch. 4 and 5
13. Session: Conclusions and Review
Oral Presentation, based on proposal outline
Writing assignment: Final proposal (abstract, research design, timeline, budget)