|
|
|
|
Fall 2011 |
3412 Friedmann |
|
MW 2-3:15pm |
Office Hours: M 3:30-4:45; W 12:30-1:45, 3:30-4:45*;
& by appt |
|
Dunbar 2204 |
*except for once a month dept mtg |
|
|
387-5698 |
|
|
jacinda.swanson@wmich.edu |
|
|
|
American Political Theory
|
|
Overview and Objectives:
This course is intended to
provide students with an introduction to some of the key texts and themes in
the history of American political thought. Although we will not be able to
discuss nearly all the prominent political writers or politically significant
ideas in U.S. history, we will cover several of the more important texts, many
of which have had a substantial influence on later political debates and on
citizens’ attitudes today. We will also begin to get some sense of the
different ways in which theorists, politicians, and political activists have
thought about politics in the United States. Moreover, we will learn about some
of the major political issues, problems, and dilemmas we have faced as a
country, some of which we still confront.
There are many different themes in American political
thought that could be the focus of such a course, but here we will focus foremost
on two: democracy (and its associated values, institutions, and practices) and
the U.S. Constitution. We will study, for example, how political thinkers have
defined democracy, equality, and liberty sometimes in similar ways and
sometimes in different ways. We will also consider how various political
writers have answered the following sorts of questions in comparable and
contrasting ways: what are the (cultural, religious, political, geographical,
economic, etc.) preconditions of democratic government? what exactly does
political (or social or economic) equality mean and require, and to whom does
it apply? how should power be distributed within the government and within
society? Authors’ particular answers to these questions are often strongly
influenced by, among other things, the political, cultural, and economic
conditions and problems of their time, making it important that we be at least
somewhat attentive to these conditions and problems. Because of these changing
conditions and problems—and in order to get a sense of the historical evolution
and shifts in American political thought—for the most part the course readings
are organized chronologically.
We will consequently see that the history of American
political thought is marked by both continuity and variation. We will find, for
instance, that some of the values and attitudes found during the earliest days
of the republic are familiar to us today, while other political issues are no
longer part of contemporary mainstream political debate. In either case, for
each text we read, we will consider whether (and how) its ideas are still
relevant today or provide an alternative (maybe better, maybe worse, maybe just
different) way of viewing American politics. Studying the history of American
political thought therefore allows us to see how issues like equality and
democratic self-government can be thought about in different ways, and what the
strengths and limitations of each of these different ways are. As a
consequence, we can begin to think critically about our own views on politics
in the United States (as well as elsewhere), the assumptions and consequences
of these views, whether alternative ways of thinking about political issues
might be worth adopting or at least considering, and why some (well-intentioned
and reasonable) fellow citizens (or global neighbors) may hold views very
different from our own about some of these issues.
Although some of the readings are
relatively accessible, many of the texts in American political theory can be
challenging. But given time, persistence, and patience, they can also be
rewarding and help clarify our own thinking about politics, as well as our
understanding of the tradition of American political theory. Consequently, this
course also seeks to improve students’ skills in carefully reading and
systematically analyzing texts. Analyzing
texts involves, for example, determining a writer’s assumptions, how
she/he defines key political concepts, the logical steps in her/his argument,
how her/his different ideas fit together, etc. It is far more than just
summarizing the text. These are skills that are useful in countless aspects
of academic and non-academic life, and arguably are important skills in being a
responsible and active member of a free and democratic society. Because these
skills are often further improved by writing and because writing skills are
themselves important, this course also aims at expanding students’ analytical
writing skills.
This
course is approved as a general education course in Distribution Area III: The
United States: Cultures and Issues.
Required Texts:
Please purchase the
specified edition of these books, so that everyone in class is using the
same edition with the same pagination, which is necessary for class discussion
and for your paper citations. Please bring the relevant book, article, or
course packet to class. We will often read and analyze passages from the
readings in class.
·
One course packet
with readings (referred to as “CP” on the syllabus), printed by
Mycoursepack.com and available at the WMU Bookstore in the Bernhard Center. If
they run out of copies, you MUST specifically ask the bookstore to order a copy
for you, which should be available for you to pick up the following day.
·
John Locke. 1980.
Second Treatise of Government, ed. by C. B. MacPherson. Indianapolis: Hackett.
·
Sanford Levinson.
2008. Our Undemocratic Constitution.
New York: Oxford University Press.
·
Readings
available on the internet or online through WMU’s Waldo Library (see below).
You are REQUIRED to print out a hard copy of these readings to bring to class.
You will also need TWO 8-1/2”
x 11” blue/green books, which can be purchased at the bookstore, for your midterm
and final exams.
Please notify me
if you have a documented disability that requires accommodation. It’s crucial
that you do so during the first week of the semester so that we can make
appropriate arrangements.
Please see the university’s
religious observance policy at http://www.wmich.edu/policies/religious-observances.html.
A complete and updated copy
of this syllabus should be consulted online, at the link for this class at http://homepages.wmich.edu/~jswanson.
Assignments and study guides will be posted on the online syllabus. In
addition, you should check your official
WMU email account regularly, since I will use that email address to email
out announcements regarding class, changes to my offices hours, and so forth.
Feel free to contact me via email with questions about the readings,
assignments, and so forth, although be aware that, in general, I will not be
checking my email regularly in the evenings or on the weekends.
Students are expected to
do the assigned readings for that day BEFORE they come to class and to
participate actively in class discussion. You will get more out of class
and it will be more interesting for all of us, if you are an active listener
(both to me and your classmates) and thoughtful and respectful discussion
participant, rather than a passive attendee. You are expected to act civilly
and respectfully towards your classmates and me, and to respond to others’
comments in an intellectual and courteous manner and without hostility, even
when you disagree (which may often be the case). Regular attendance is
required, but if you have to miss class, YOU are responsible for finding
out from a classmate what you missed and for getting copies of the notes
and any class handouts. Please always bring a copy of the syllabus with you to
class so that you know which readings we are discussing in class that day. When
you do the assigned readings, you should do more than just read the material,
you should also REFLECT on it and take a few (or more) notes on the main
arguments and concepts/terms employed by the author. Taking your own notes on
the readings is particularly important in this class since we are reading
several different political thinkers; it will also make studying for exams and
writing your papers easier. The study guides for the exams are posted on the
on-line syllabus. I strongly recommend looking over the relevant portion of
the study guide before doing each of the assigned readings.
Responsibility for leading class
discussion:
In order to encourage ALL
students, rather than just a handful of students, to participate in class
discussion, all students will be assigned to “lead” class discussion 3-4 times
during the semester. For each regular class session, approximately 5-7 students
will be assigned to make at least 1-2 substantial contributions to class
discussion, where substantial means informed and thoughtful (NOT long-winded)
and contributions can be in the form of answers to questions or thoughtful
questions about the meaning or implications of an author’s arguments. On the
days students are assigned to lead discussion, they will be evaluated with a
plus, check, or minus, which will factor into their overall class participation
grade (after class, they should quickly check in with me to make sure I
noted and evaluated their participation); this does NOT relieve these
students of their obligation to participate in class discussion regularly on
other days. In other words, ALL students should be regularly participating
in class discussion, regardless of whether they are assigned to lead class
discussion. If you are unable to attend class on a day you are assigned to lead
discussion, it is YOUR responsibility to trade days with another student and to
INFORM ME of the change. If you have a last minute emergency or illness that
prevents you from trading days with another student, you MUST inform me of the
emergency ASAP, and you will be expected to lead class discussion in the next regular
class session. A schedule of class sessions & assigned students will be posted on the online syllabus on Tue., Sept.
13, which you should print out.
Your grade for the course
will consist of the following:
·
in-class discussion
participation (attendance will be taken each class to help me keep track of
participation—you can’t participate if you’re not in class), 7%
·
short,
unannounced open-book & open-note pop-quizzes at the beginning of class,
20% total (you MUST arrive to class on time in order to take them; missed
quizzes will only be excused if you have a documented, excused absence; your
lowest quiz grade will be dropped)
·
short
analytical writing assignment, 5%
·
1-2
analytical papers: 28% total; two papers will be assigned, but you are only
REQUIRED TO TURN IN THE FIRST PAPER; you will not be allowed to submit the second
paper if you have not turned in the first paper; if you choose to write the
second paper, your overall paper grade will consist of the average of your
first and second paper grades. (The analytical papers will be written on
assigned topics and will be based on the assigned readings and class
discussion; they do not require outside reading or research.)
·
mid-semester
exam, 20% (The exams will be short-, medium-, and/or long-answer.)
·
cumulative
final exam, 20%
You are to hand in a hard,
paper copy of assignments. Unless you have specific permission from me, you are
NOT to email me your written assignments; if you receive such permission, it is
YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to make sure I received the assignment (I will send you an
email indicating whether or not the file came through successfully); DO NOT
assume I have received it just because the email apparently went through.
You are responsible for
making yourself aware of and understanding the policies and procedures in the
Undergraduate Catalog that pertain to Academic Honesty. These policies include
cheating, fabrication, falsification and forgery, multiple submission,
plagiarism, complicity and computer misuse. (The policies can be found at http://catalog.wmich.edu under Academic
Policies, Student Rights and Responsibilities.) If there is reason to believe
you have been involved in academic dishonesty, you will be referred to the
Office of Student Conduct. You will be given the opportunity to review the
charge(s). If you believe you are not responsible, you will have the
opportunity for a hearing. You should consult with me if you are uncertain
about an issue of academic honesty prior to the submission of an assignment or
test. A finding of responsibility for
academic dishonesty on any assignment will result in failure of this
course (see the Undergraduate Catalog).
To avoid disrupting class
discussion, please turn off and PUT AWAY cell phones, beepers, and other
electronic devices before you come into class and refrain from chatting
with your neighbor or eating anything in a noisy wrapper. Laptops will be
banned from the classroom if their use becomes disruptive or distracting;
computers should ONLY be used for taking notes. Students are NOT allowed to
text, email, etc. during class. Please arrive to class on time. If you need
to leave class early because of an important, unavoidable appointment, please
let me know before class and minimize the disruption to the class when you
leave.
Late assignments and make-up exams:
All
papers are due at the beginning of class.
You are discouraged from handing the analytical papers in late, but if you do,
points will be deducted accordingly: one grade (5 points) will be taken off if
you turn it in within 3 days of the due date; two grades (10 points) will be
taken off if you turn it in within 7 days. NO PAPERS will be accepted more than
a week after the due date. The short analytical writing assignment may NOT be
turned in late.
Make-up
exams will be given for excused absences only; in such cases, you must notify
me well in advance of the exam and arrange to take it before the day of the exam. Only in the most dire or unusual
circumstances will you be allowed to make up an exam without penalty if you
have not made arrangements for doing so before the day of the exam.
Grading scale:
|
|
A=93-100 |
B=83-87 |
C=73-77 |
D=60-67 |
|
|
BA=88-92 |
CB=78-82 |
DC=68-72 |
E=0-59 |
Course Outline:
|
Sept. 7 |
Introduction: Overview of course and its objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of Different Political
Theories/Ideologies
|
|
Sept. 12 |
Ball and Dagger, excerpts from “The Democratic
Ideal” & “Liberalism” 1995 (CP) |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 14 |
Ball and Dagger, excerpts from “Conservatism” (CP) |
|
|
familiarize yourself with the main tenets of the Republican and Democratic national parties by looking
at their websites or the 2008 Democratic
and Republican platforms |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Colonial Period |
|
Sept. 19 |
John Winthrop, “A Modell of Christian
Charity” 1630 (CP) |
|
|
|
|
|
Liberal
Thought |
|
Sept. 21 |
John Locke, excerpts from Second Treatise of Government, paragraphs 4, 6-8, 11-23 (1689-90) |
|
|
SHORT ANALYTICAL
WRITING ASSIGNMENT POSTED ONLINE (link to
assignment) |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 26 |
Locke, Second Treatise of Government, paragraphs 87-91, 95-99, 123-37, 149 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 28 |
Locke, Second Treatise of
Government, paragraphs
155, 199, 211-22, 243 |
|
|
The Declaration of Independence 1776, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp
[PRINT out a hard copy to bring to class; number the paragraphs as you read
it] |
|
|
SHORT ANALYTICAL
WRITING ASSIGNMENT DUE |
|
|
|
|
|
Civic Republican Thought During the
Founding Period |
|
Oct. 3 |
Ronald Takaki, “The ‘Iron Cage’ in the New Nation”
1990 (CP) |
|
|
The Tribune, “No. xvii” 1766 (CP) |
|
|
Benjamin Rush, “A Plan for the Establishment of
Public Schools…” 1786 (CP) |
|
|
review Ball and Dagger,
31-5 (CP)
|
|
|
FIRST ANALYTICAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT POSTED ONLINE (link to assignment)
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 5 |
finish Rush |
|
|
Storing, “The Small
Republic,” 15-23 (1981) (CP) |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Constitution |
|
Oct. 10 |
The Constitution of the United States of America 1787 (in Levinson) |
|
|
link
to worksheet on some of Constitution’s main provisions |
|
|
United
States v. Lopez 1995 (handout) |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 12 |
Federalist Paper #10 (1787), http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed10.asp
[PRINT out a hard copy to bring to class; number the paragraphs as you read
it] |
|
|
Storing, “The Federalist Reply,” 38-47,
51-2, 72-4 (1981) (CP) |
|
|
FIRST
ANALYTICAL PAPER DUE |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 17 |
Levinson, Our
Undemocratic Constitution, Prelude, Introduction, Ch. 1, Ch. 2: pp. 25-38
(2008) |
|
|
review Article I of Constitution |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 19 |
EXAM:
bring blue book (link to study guide) |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 24 |
Levinson, Our Undemocratic
Constitution, Ch. 2: pp. 38-77 |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 26 |
Richie and Hill, “Proportional Representation” 1996 (CP) |
|
|
|
|
Oct. 31 |
Levinson, Our
Undemocratic Constitution, Ch. 3: 79-97 |
|
|
One campaign to reform the Electoral College: http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
(explore this website & familiarize yourself with the legislation &
campaign’s progress) |
|
|
SECOND ANALYTICAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT POSTED ONLINE (link to assignment)
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 2 |
Levinson, Our Undemocratic
Constitution, Ch. 3: 98-122; Afterword: section IV, pp. 208-13 |
|
|
review Article II of Constitution |
|
|
|
|
Nov. 7 |
Federalist Paper #78 (1788), http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed78.asp
[PRINT out a hard copy to bring to class; number the paragraphs as you read
it] |
|
|
review Article III of Constitution |
|
|
Levinson, Our
Undemocratic Constitution, Ch. 4 |
|
|
|
|
Nov. 9 |
Brutus, Essay XI, XV (CP) |
|
|
Tushnet, “Democracy Versus Judicial Review” 2005
(CP) |
|
|
SECOND
ANALYTICAL PAPER DUE |
|
|
|
|
Nov. 14 |
Levinson, Our Undemocratic
Constitution, Ch. 5, 6, 7, Coda, Afterword: section V & VI, pp. 213-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Democracy and Economic Inequality: The Role of Interest Groups &
Political Parties |
|
Nov. 16 |
Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson. 2010.
“Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the
Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics & Society 38, no. 2 (June): 152-204. Available through WestCat, under the journal title, https://www.library.wmich.edu/
[PRINT out a hard copy of the pdf to bring to class; read first half, pp.
152-75] |
|
|
|
|
Nov. 21 |
Hacker and Pierson, “Winner-Take-All Politics,” 175-97
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 23 |
NO CLASS OR OFFICE HOURS (Thanksgiving
break) |
|
|
|
|
|
Socialist
Thought
|
|
Nov. 28 |
Henry Demarest Lloyd, “Revolution: The Evolution of
Socialism” (1894) and “A New Political
Economy Predicting a New Wealth” (1897) (CP) |
|
|
|
|
Nov. 30 |
Stephen Resnick and Richard Wolff.
2010. “The Economic Crisis: A Marxian Interpretation.” Rethinking Marxism 22, no. 2 (April): 170-86. Available through
WestCat, under the journal title, https://www.library.wmich.edu/
[PRINT out a hard copy of the pdf to bring to class] |
|
|
|
|
|
African American Political Thought |
|
Dec. 5 |
Cornel West, “Race and Social Theory” 1987 (CP) |
|
|
Manning Marable, “Racism,
Prisons, and the Future of Black America” 2000-1 (CP) |
|
|
Gary Younge, “New Orleans Forsaken”
2006 (CP) |
|
|
|
|
|
Feminist Thought |
|
Dec. 7 |
Nancy Fraser, “After the Family Wage” 1997 (CP) |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 12 |
FINAL
EXAM (Mon., 2:45-4:45pm): bring
blue book (link to study
guide) |