The Insider: Discussion questions

1. “Victim logic”

--what is it?

--does it apply here?

(if no, why not? If so, how, and what ideas and issues does it lead to?)

2. Responsibility as a key idea in the film

--how so?

--what kinds?

3. What results from treating Wigand’s story as a docudrama, rather than a documentary? How is this potentially a different kind of argument?