The Insider:  Discussion questions

 

1.  “Victim logic”

    

--what is it?

    

--does it apply here?

(if no, why not?  If so, how, and what ideas and issues does it lead to?)

 

 

2.  Responsibility as a key idea in the film

     --how so?

     --what kinds?

 

 

3.  What results from treating Wigand’s story as a docudrama, rather than a documentary?  How is this potentially a different kind of argument?