The Insider:  Discussion questions


1.  “Victim logic”


--what is it?


--does it apply here?

(if no, why not?  If so, how, and what ideas and issues does it lead to?)



2.  Responsibility as a key idea in the film

     --how so?

     --what kinds?



3.  What results from treating Wigand’s story as a docudrama, rather than a documentary?  How is this potentially a different kind of argument?