Introduction:
George Varley and his
colleagues at Oxford University in England wanted to find out what caused
population fluctuations in the winter moth, Operophtera brumata, feeding on oak trees, Quercus robur, in Wytham Woods near Oxford. They censused oak trees as shown in
Figure 7.1 (from Varley et al., 1973)
in order to count the numbers in different life history stages and create a
life table. The moth is
reproductively active in early winter (hence its name) with males flying
actively in November to find large, wingless females as they climb the trunks
of oak trees. The females are
basically large egg sacks and the winged males mate with them as they climb the
trees to lay their eggs on twigs that will carry the new leaves the following
spring. These leaves are the
larval food.
Data
Observations:
Observations by
George Varley and his colleagues found that there were 4.39 live adult
females/m2 climbing the trees in
November and that each female laid 150 eggs on the bark of oak trees. In spring, there were 96.4 full-grown
larvae/m2 and that of these, 6.2/m2 were killed by a fly parasitoid, 2.6/m2 were killed by other parasites, and 4.6/m2 were infected and killed by a
microsporidian parasite. From
these numbers they determined how many pupae were formed. It was easy to see that 13.4/m2 of the pupae were killed by a parasitic
wasp, but it was not easy to measure how many were eaten by predators. So predator mortality was estimated
from the information gathered.
Finally, 7.5 adult females/m2
were found climbing the trees in the following November.
From these data,
Varley and his colleagues produced the life table shown in Table 7.2 (also from
Varley et al., 1973). The research team then went on to
collect a further 19 years of data, and these data shown below provide the basis
for your exercise in detecting density-dependent mortality factors.
Using the following
data, we would like you to determine which mortality factors show the strongest
density-dependent regulation of population size (from Varley et al., 1973, Table F) (Data
are in this linked spreadsheet).
Year
|
stage |
k |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
|
|
k1 |
1.59 |
0.56 |
1.14 |
1.33 |
0.24 |
1.16 |
0.83 |
0.48 |
0.83 |
1.15 |
1.21 |
0.91 |
1.09 |
0.85 |
0.66 |
0.52 |
1.42 |
1.20 |
1.19 |
|
Log. larvae |
|
2.05 |
2.07 |
1.74 |
1.26 |
2.20 |
1.89 |
1.98 |
2.44 |
2.28 |
1.76 |
1.33 |
0.88 |
1.13 |
1.61 |
2.12 |
2.43 |
1.71 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
|
|
k2 |
0.11 |
0.01 |
0.003 |
0.01 |
0.004 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.10 |
0.02 |
--- |
0.02 |
--- |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
--- |
|
|
k3 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
|
|
k4 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
--- |
0.03 |
|
|
k5 |
0.69 |
0.77 |
0.75 |
0.34 |
0.73 |
0.65 |
0.47 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.66 |
0.72 |
0.22 |
0.24 |
0.40 |
0.74 |
0.87 |
0.86 |
0.50 |
0.48 |
|
|
k6 |
0.29 |
0.10 |
0.03 |
0.16 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
0.28 |
0.20 |
0.16 |
0.15 |
0.45 |
0.08 |
0.06 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.33 |
--- |
--- |
Note: In the linked data sheet, estimates of the missing data have been added to make it easier for you to use Excel (it is important to note that Excel is not a reliable program to use for data analysis Ð we use it because it is readily available and illustrates the methods we are emphasizing).
To do this we would like you to
do the following:
(1) Enter
the data vertically as shown in the attached Excel sheet (do not enter zero for
missing data points) and calculate Ktotal values for each year (sum each kx value).
(2) Draw
a graph using the graph wizard of each kx-value and Ktotal (y-axis) plotted against time (year) on the
x-axis. Which kx values do you think are most responsible for overall
mortality?
(3) Using
the ÒToolsÓ menu select Òdata analysisÓ and then ÒregressionÓ and use linear
regressions to regress each kx value as the dependent variable against Ktotal values as the independent variable across all 19
years. This will give you 6
separate analyses.
For each analysis do the following once
you have selected ÒregressionÓ:
Input Y: enter the range for your kx values
(including the column title) e.g.
$B$1:$B$20 (the $ just means that you have fixed that cell and it wonÕt change
- this is the range of data from cell B1 to cell B20 in the B column and rows 1
to 20).
Input X: e.g. $H$1:$H$20 (if Ktotal is in column H).
Check the labels box: (this
indicates that you have included the column headings)
Output options: indicate where you want the regression
analysis to be placed (e.g. if
you enter A23 the analysis will start at cell A23 in the top left hand corner)
Residuals: check the Òline fit plotsÓ option (this
will automatically plot a graph of the data and the regression as a series of
predicted points).
This analysis will tell you which mortality factors
have a significant density dependent association with total mortality. From the summary output you need the R
square value, and from the ANOVA table you need the F and significance of F
values (these tell you whether the regression was significant - any
significance value less than 0.05 is significant (very low probability (less
than 5%) that they are the same), and lastly you need the coefficients for the
intercept on the y-axis and the slope (b) which is the coefficient under the
intercept (its P-value will be the same as the ANOVA ÒSignificance FÓ value.
For each of these 6 regressions, make a summary table
that gives the comparison (e.g. k1 against Ktotal), then the R2, intercept, regression coefficient (slope or b), F, and Significance F
(P-value).
(4) In
the same way as for (3) above, plot each kx value against the logarithm of the density of the
stage on which the mortality acted.
To do this you will need to calculate these densities using the log
larvae data. For example, k1 was the mortality that acted on the eggs and so the
actual density was (log larvae + k1)
Similarly you should appreciate that k2 acted on log larvae, but k3 acted on (log larvae - k2), and k4 acted on (log larvae-(k2+k3)), etc.
When
you have completed these regressions, make a summary table as in (3) of the
regression statistics.
(5) Using
the two tables from (3) and (4) write up your conclusions about what mortality
factors (kx) were
responsible for density dependent mortality and density-dependent regulation of
this population of winter moths.
References:
Varley, G.C., G.R. Gradwell, and M.P.
Hassell. 1973. Insect Population Ecology. An analytical approach. Black Scientific Publications, Oxford, 212 pages.
