BIOS 615: ECOLOGY

Review Paper

Dr Stephen B. Malcolm

 

 

Review Paper:  The course also requires that each participant must submit a review paper that follows the theme of, "The logistic equation in ecology: history, uses and abuses"  This paper should follow the style and content of papers in the journal Ecological Monographs and it should be double spaced, 12pt font (either Times/Times Roman or Helvetica/Arial) and at least 10 pages long, excluding the Literature Cited and any figures you may use (see Ecological Monographs 64(1): 110-112 (1994) for Instructions to Authors).  This review paper must be handed in no later than Thursday, 7 April 2005.  Of course you are very welcome to hand it in earlier and you are also welcome to discuss it with Steve Malcolm and submit a draft before final submission.

 

This paper will be marked critically as though you were submitting it for publication.  As a recent editor of an international journal I will use the same criteria for judging your paper.  It should be readable, grammatically correct (also use a spelling checker) and must be word-processed.  The source of figures used must be fully acknowledged and plagiarism must be avoided absolutely (any evidence of plagiarism will result in a score of zero).  You may make this review very general with an emphasis on history, or mathematics, or biological concepts; or you may focus on a single problem or phenomenon.  For example, if you have a biomedical interest you may wish to compare the use of the Michaelis-Menten-Holling equation for the description of enzyme kinetics with its use to describe the foraging behavior of predators, parasites or herbivores, and subsequent incorporation into the logistic relationship.  Or you may wish to focus on the disease dynamics of HIV infections, or the dynamics of medfly populations in California, or how to describe whale populations, or the dynamics of harvested fish populations, or model moose-wolf interactions on Isle Royale, or lynx-grouse-hare interactions in Northern Canada, or assess the impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations in the field, or discuss whether populations actually show density-dependent, logistic limitation, etc.

 

Please include all sources in your paper and make sure that you have at least 10 primary sources of information.  Primary sources are peer-reviewed journal articles (not magazines, books or web sources).

 

Grading rubric for the review paper is as follows:

 

(1)    Content and presentation (general overview)

20 points

(2)   Structure (hypotheses, logic of organization, significance of argument)

30 points

(3)   Interest (use of sources, innovative arguments, use of figures)

20 points

(4)   Relevance of topic to the logistic equation

20 points

(5)   References

10 points

Total

100 points