Flight Safety & Human Performance Research
Research Project: A study comparing the accuracy of performing digital, paper, and aural checklists using a feedback intervention package during normal workload conditions in simulated flight (Hilton).
examined both technical sequential flight skills & observable pilot
behavior using the Cirrus SR20 FTD during normal instrument workload
environments. For remote observation and inter-rater reliability checks, we positioned 2 digital video cameras within the cockpit
to record behaviors of all participants. Behaviors of interest are those prompted by checklist use. We evaluated, a) the accuracy of both paper and digital checklists, b) the effect of graphic feedback to improve both traditional paper checklist and digital checklist performance and c) determined if there is any difference between performances using paper or digital checklists in a normal workload environment.
Paper, Digital, and Aural Checklist Performance Improvement Presentation
The view from the rear of the Frasca 241-Cirrus SR20 FTD.
data collection station is to the right. The FTD has wrap around visual projection.
The flight deck of the Frasca 241-Cirrus SR20 FTD
The primary flight display (PFD) on the left and the multi-functional
display (MFD) showing the digital checklist in the center of the panel.
The primary flight display (PFD)
The multi-functional display (MFD)
Illustrates the digital checklist item changes color as the pilot pushes the DONE button to confirm it is completed.
Instructional panel of the Cirrus SR20 FTD
Observation station for data collection and recording
Located in an area adjacent to the Frasca 241-Cirrus SR20 FTD. At this station experimenters can observe and record both sights and sounds occurring on the flight deck. Graphic feedback was also produced at this location.
No animals were harmed during these experiments!
Ron Van Houten, Ph.D. Psychology
Alyce Dickinson Ph.D. Psychology