| PSCI 4220 Fall 2005 Civil Liberties/Rights |
| TR
11:00 - 12:15 4208 Dunbar Hall |
| Dr. Peter Renstrom |
REQUIRED TEXTS
Lee Epstein & Thomas G. Walker - Constitutional
Law for a Changing
America: Rights, Liberties and Justice (5th edition)
READING OUTLINE
I. The Supreme Court and Judicial
Review
(Sept. 1)
Baum OR comparable Supreme Court text - all
II. Jurisdiction and Decision Making
(Sept. 4)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 3-73
III. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
(Sept. 6)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 75-97
IV. Free Exercise of Religion (Sept. 8)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 105-145
V. Religious Establishment (Sept. 15)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 145-213
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_ *** FIRST EXAM, Tuesday, October 4 *** ______
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Free Speech: Development of Legal
Standards (Oct. 6)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 214-245
VII. Regulating Expression (Oct. 13)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 246-318
VIII. Freedom of the Media (Oct. 20)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 319-357
IX. Obscenity and Libel (Oct. 27)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 358-417
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_
***** TAKE-HOME
EXAM_____*****_____________
___ due: end of class on Thursday, November 3_ ________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X. Equal Protection: Race (Nov. 3)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 651-696
XI. Equal Protection: Nonrace (Nov. 10)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 696-744
XII. Protection of Civil Rights: Legislative
and
Judicial Remedies (Nov. 15)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 744-778
XIII. Voting Rights (Nov. 17)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 780-835
XIV. Privacy and Abortion (Nov. 29)
Epstein & Walker, pp. 429-499
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL EXAM________________
Wednesday, December 7, 10:15a.m. - 12:15 p.m._
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
You are responsible for making yourself aware of
and
understanding the polices and procedures in the
Undergraduate Catalog
(pp.
274-76) that pertain
to Student Academic Conduct, particularly the
section
pertaining to Academic Honesty. These policies include
cheating,
fabrication, falsification and forgery,
mulitiple submission,
plagarism,
complicity and computer misuse. If there is reason to believe that any
student(s)
has been involved in academic dishonesty, that
student(s)
will be referred to the Office of
Student Judicial Affairs. Students
who
may be uncertain about an issue of academic dishonesty are
invited and
urged to
consult with me prior to the submission of any
assignment
or test.
INCOMPLETE POLICY (p. 29, Undergraduate
Catalog).
An incomplete is a "temporary grade" given when "illness, necessary
absence, or other
reasons beyond the control of the student prevent
completion
of the course requirements
by the end of the semester or session." The
student must be PASSING the course and
have completed a majority of
the
coursework to be eligible to receive an "I"; The grade
of incomplete
"MAY
NOT BE GIVEN AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A FAILING GRADE."
If the unfinished
work
is not completed within a calendar year from the time the incomplete
is
assigned, "the grade shall be converted to an 'E' (failure)."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
A. Class Participation
Each student will be expected to stay current with the
reading assignments and come to class prepared to discuss
each day's
assignments.
No specific portion of the semester grade is designated for this
requirement,
but regular
participation in class discussions will weigh favorably and
substantially in the determination of the final semester grade.
B. Examinations
The semester grade will be based in large part on three
exams. The first and final exams will be of the in-class type and
will
contain fill-in, short answer, and essay questions. The first exam will
be worth 75 points, and the final will be
comprehensive and worth 100
points.
Study guides are available by clicking on the links in this syllabus.
The
second
exam will be a take-home exam. It is available by clicking on
the
second exam link. The take-home exam will be worth
75 points. If an
exam
is scheduled on a day when the university is officially closed (e.g., a
snow day), the exam will be
given at the next class session. Make-up
exams
will be allowed when warranted. If an exam is to be missed, students
are
expected to make arrangements prior to the scheduled exam if possible.
Once exams have been graded and returned,
make-up exams will be
possible
only under the most extenuating of circumstances. The instructor
reserves
the option
of altering any or all elements of a make-up exam including
substantial changes in content and format.
C. The "Justice/Case" Paper
Each student will be given an index card with the
name
of a Supreme Court justice, a case title, and a Roman numeral.
Each
student
is to research the justice and the case, and prepare a 5-6 page paper
examining
how the justice's background
"explains" his/her behavior in the
assigned
case. In most cases, the assigned justice has written the opinion of
the
Court,
or issued a separate concurring or dissenting opinion. You are
to
discuss how this justice's pre-Court background and
personal value
orientation
show up in the case. Don't just give a brief biographical description
of
the justice. Focus on
those things that influenced his/her value
development.
Then connect those values to the case. Focus on the justice's
thinking
in the case. The same justice will be assigned to several students, but
the justice is combined with a particular
case only once. While any
background
material will be helpful, there is a five-volume set of books in Waldo
that can
provide a solid base for almost everyone. This set of volumes
is Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel's, The Justices of the
United
States Supreme Court (KF 8744.F75 1995). Check as well Melvin
I. Urofsky's, The Supreme Court Justices
(KF 8744.5859 1994).
These are reference volumes and cannot be checked out, but you can
photocopy
what you need.
You need to use an online database such as Firstsearch
for
additional sources on your justice. Use the OYEZ PROJECT
link
at
the top of the page for justice information. Full text of your assigned
case can be found by using LEXIS or FINDLAW
(link to
FINDLAW
at the top of the page).
The paper is worth 50 points. The critical element
will
be your causal analysis -- what can you find from your justice's
background
that "explains" the position taken in the case. The paper is due at the
class session of Thursday, November 17.
Late papers will
be
accepted, but a 2-point deduction will be assessed for each day the
paper
is submitted after November 17
(including weekends and Thanksgiving break). No late paper will be
accepted after the end of class on December 1, and a
score of 0 (zero)
for the project will automatically result if not in my hands by
December 1. Save your paper on at least one
disk or a photocopy in the event
something
occurs which requires you to reproduce the paper.
D. Reading cases from this year
There are several cases decided by the Court since
our
textbook was published that everyone will be expected to locate
and
read.
The simplest way is to click on the Findlaw link at the top of the
first
page. Down the first Findlaw page is a heading
called "Browsing." Click
on 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, or Recent Decisions. An alphabetical
list
of last year's cases will appear.
The cases you are to read are listed
on the reading assignment outline. You will be expected to know these
cases
for exams --
just as though they came from the casebook.
| Dr. Peter Renstrom | |
| 3420 Friedmann Hall | 269.387.5697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|