Project
Report Portfolio Grading Factors
|
Grading Areas |
Evaluation Criteria |
Factors to Consider |
|
Project
Criteria |
|
|
|
Category
(Rate) |
|
|
|
Level of Thought and Analysis (10 Points) |
Degree
of critical thinking displayed in description of project needs, issues, purposes
& analysis |
Include
both your logical process of critical
thinking and strategic development approaches Reasons for
choosing project and topic What work was
actually accomplished Methodology of
critical thinking and learning Work done on regular basis or just
prior to completing report Quality of content and thoroughness of
project development Appropriate referencing of sources Adequate
progress over first three weeks Proof of work
and support material Actual project results, depending on
project choice Diagrams, figures, tables, flowcharts
and photos Complete
bibliography |
|
Overall Quality of Content -- Project Planning and
Implementation (10 Points) |
Overall
discussion of project content, development, & execution of critical
thinking produce value |
|
|
Effort on the Project (5 Points) |
Evaluation
of ownership & dedication toward project development |
|
|
Quality of Writing the Project Report (5 Points) |
Quality
of organization, sentence structure, language & readership |
|
|
Completeness of the Project Report (5 Points) |
A
measure of fulfilling the project requirements |
|
|
Results, Illustrations, Resources and Bibliography (5 Points) |
Quality
of project results, resources, referencing, illustrations & bibliography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Assessment
Criteria |
|
|
|
Category
(Rate) |
|
|
|
Level of Diligence/Effort throughout the Self-Assessment Process (10 Points) |
Consistent
& continuous development of quality areas of improvement, action plans
& insight analysis |
Insight
Analysis Key results Most important short term action plans Effect of mood and attitude Insights for improving skills Insights for project approach for next
week Areas of
Improvement Short Action
Plans What enhanced skills growth What was and can be improved Long Term
Goals/Objectives For project For career Accurate,
believable and committed Adequate
referencing of Self-Assessment Journal as sources |
|
Your Ability to Self-Assess Project and Skills Performance (10 Points) |
Degree
of honesty & objectivity in analyzing of your self-learning |
|
|
Your Commitment to Improving your Growth through Self-Learning (5 Points) |
Evaluation
of dedication to skills improvement & project work accomplished each week |
|
|
Primary Referencing of Information on Self-Assessment Journals (5 Points) |
Connection
of discussion and journal references to meaningful action plans &
insights recorded on journals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Assessment
Journals |
|
|
|
Category
(Rate) |
|
|
|
Start-Up Self-Assessment Journal 1 2.5 Points) |
Quality
of benchmarking strength & area of improvement skills, as well as short
& long term action plans |
7 Journals with feedback Benchmarking of strength and area of
improvement skills, short and long term action plans (Start-Up) |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 2 (5.5 Points) |
Quality
of follow-through on action plans, analyzed results & identification of
insights for new self-growth, plus planning of strength & area of
improvement skills and corresponding short & long term action plans for the
following week |
Analysis area of improvement skills
& past week’s results, identification of success action plans, insights
for future skills self-growth and project development plans, plus direction
of next week’s strength and area of improvement skills and detail short term
activities and long term action plans Submitted
regularly each week (Journals 2 & 6) |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 3 (5.5 Points) |
Same |
|
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 4 (5.5 Points) |
Same |
|
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 5 (5.5 Points) |
Same |
|
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 6 (5.5 Points) |
Same |
|