Project Criteria

Category (Rate)

Poor (1)

Fair (2)

Good (3)

Very Good (4)

Excellent (5)

Total

Level of Thought and Analysis

Minimal thought and very little analysis

General thesis statements, but seldom supported

Premises connect, meaningfully developed and have supporting evidence

Concept well formulated, developed with thought and reflection, results described in meaningful way

Specific project needs exceeded, needs and issues well identified, strong approaches, clear purpose and analysis

2*

Rate = Total

Overall Quality of Content -- Project Planning and Imple-mentation

Content has little value

Project plan and the associated efforts produce something of value

Project planning produced meaningful implementa-tion and ongoing reflection

A valuable project definition and strong execution produced meaningful success

Project conception, development, critical thinking produced outstanding significant, implementation

2*

Rate = Total

Effort on the Project

Simple walk through, no ownership

Settled on something meaningful, but not a complete project plan

Carefully consider what to do, thought through how to do it, and put in satisfactory effort

Made consistent effort from project definition to implementa-tion with much reflection on how to improve the project

Took complete ownership of project development and results with constant reflection and dedication toward superior results

1*

Rate = Total

Quality of Writing the Project Report

Disorganized and inadequate grammar

Some structure and adequate grammar

Organized with flow and meaning

Strong structure, strong sentences and grammar

Excellent organization, flow of meaning, use of subheads and language

1*

Rate = Total

Complete-ness of the Project Report

Numerous deficiencies

Mostly complete

All components represented but some not complete

All of the project requirements included and mostly complete

All of the project requirements fulfilled and complete

1*

Rate = Total

Results, illustrations, resources and bibliography

Support material of little value

Results, illustrations and resources of some value

Examples and resources illustrate meaningful results

Almost every reference well-done, good illustrations or examples

Components all reference properly, results appropriately illustrated

1* Rate = Total


Self-Assessment Criteria

Category (Rate)

Poor (1)

Fair (2)

Good (3)

Very Good (4)

Excellent (5)

Total

Level of Diligence and Effort throughout the Self-Assessment Process

Sporadic

Some regular planning with some action plan follow-up

Regularly makes weekly action plans, but does not follow through on everything

Assertive action plans and good follow-up effort

Eagerly and ambitiously engaged in developing regular actions plans from insights gained

2*

Rate = Total

Your Ability to Self-Assess Project and Skills Performance

Mostly obtuse in seeing oneself objectively

Limited in scope and depth

Reflective with some objectivity and analysis

Clear criteria, good observations, analysis, and action plans

Honest, open, objective and purposeful in self-learning

2*

Rate = Total

Your Commitment to Improving your Growth through Self-Learning

Lacks follow through

Makes some attempts to improve

Tries to work on something of value weekly

Produced important weekly changes in self-learning

Layered action plans effectively to produce constant self-improvement and growth

1*

Rate = Total

Primary Referencing of Information on Self-Assessment Journals

Sporadic referencing to the journals with little logical relationship

Some meaning links with supporting evidence

Logical linkages from the journals to the skill improvement

Connectivity over time of growth in skill by showing evidence from the journals

Numerous links by referencing to the specific journals meaningfully to the skill improvement

1*

Rate = Total


Self-Assessment Journals

Category (Rate)

Poor (1)

Fair (2)

Good (3)

Very Good (4)

Excellent (5)

Total

Start-Up Self-Assessment

Journal 1

Exist

Complete

Complete and meaningful

Clear strengths with actions plans

Thoughtful and powerful action plans

.6 *

Rate = Total

Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 2

Completed parts of the journal without much thought

Some effort in filling out the form, but strengths, action plans and insights sketchy

Some insights and developed general action plans, not real effective in assessing results and using insights

Attempt to follow through on action plan, reported some results and took some action on new understandings from insights

Followed through with action plans, analyzed results and utilized insights to create new self-growth action plans

.9 *

Rate = Total

Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 3

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

.9 *

Rate = Total

Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 4

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

.9 *

Rate = Total

Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 5

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

.9 *

Rate = Total

Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 6

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

.9 *

Rate = Total

Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 7

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as

Journal 2

Same basis as Journal 2

.9 *

Rate = Total