|
Category (Rate) |
Poor (1) |
Fair (2) |
Good (3) |
Very Good (4) |
Excellent (5) |
Total |
|
|
Level of Thought and Analysis |
Minimal thought and very little analysis |
General thesis statements, but seldom supported |
Premises connect, meaningfully developed and have supporting evidence |
Concept well formulated, developed with thought and reflection, results described in meaningful way |
Specific project needs exceeded, needs and issues well identified, strong approaches, clear purpose and analysis |
2* Rate = Total |
|
|
Overall Quality of Content -- Project Planning and Imple-mentation |
Content has little value |
Project plan and the associated efforts produce something of value |
Project planning produced meaningful implementa-tion and ongoing reflection |
A valuable project definition and strong execution produced meaningful success |
Project conception, development, critical thinking produced outstanding significant, implementation |
2* Rate = Total |
|
|
Effort on the Project |
Simple walk through, no ownership |
Settled on something meaningful, but not a complete project plan |
Carefully consider what to do, thought through how to do it, and put in satisfactory effort |
Made consistent effort from project definition to implementa-tion with much reflection on how to improve the project |
Took complete ownership of project development and results with constant reflection and dedication toward superior results |
1* Rate = Total |
|
|
Quality of Writing the Project Report |
Disorganized and inadequate grammar |
Some structure and adequate grammar |
Organized with flow and meaning |
Strong structure, strong sentences and grammar |
Excellent organization, flow of meaning, use of subheads and language |
1* Rate = Total |
|
|
Complete-ness of the Project Report |
Numerous deficiencies |
Mostly complete |
All components represented but some not complete |
All of the project requirements included and mostly complete |
All of the project requirements fulfilled and complete |
1* Rate = Total |
|
|
Results, illustrations, resources and bibliography |
Support material of little value |
Results, illustrations and resources of some value |
Examples and resources illustrate meaningful results |
Almost every reference well-done, good illustrations or examples |
Components all reference properly, results appropriately illustrated |
1* Rate = Total |
|
Self-Assessment Criteria
|
Category (Rate) |
Poor (1) |
Fair (2) |
Good (3) |
Very Good (4) |
Excellent (5) |
Total |
|
Level of Diligence and Effort throughout the
Self-Assessment Process |
Sporadic |
Some regular planning with some action plan follow-up |
Regularly makes weekly action plans, but does not follow through on everything |
Assertive action plans and good follow-up effort |
Eagerly and ambitiously engaged in developing regular actions plans from insights gained |
2* Rate = Total |
|
Your Ability to Self-Assess Project and Skills Performance |
Mostly obtuse in seeing oneself objectively |
Limited in scope and depth |
Reflective with some objectivity and analysis |
Clear criteria, good observations, analysis, and action plans |
Honest, open, objective and purposeful in self-learning |
2* Rate = Total |
|
Your Commitment to Improving your Growth through
Self-Learning |
Lacks follow through |
Makes some attempts to improve |
Tries to work on something of value weekly |
Produced important weekly changes in self-learning |
Layered action plans effectively to produce constant self-improvement and growth |
1* Rate = Total |
|
Primary Referencing of Information on Self-Assessment
Journals |
Sporadic referencing to the journals with little logical relationship |
Some meaning links with supporting evidence |
Logical linkages from the journals to the skill improvement |
Connectivity over time of growth in skill by showing evidence from the journals |
Numerous links by referencing to the specific journals meaningfully to the skill improvement |
1* Rate = Total |
Self-Assessment
Journals
|
Category (Rate) |
Poor (1) |
Fair (2) |
Good (3) |
Very Good (4) |
Excellent (5) |
Total |
|
Start-Up Self-Assessment Journal 1 |
Exist |
Complete |
Complete and meaningful |
Clear strengths with actions plans |
Thoughtful and powerful action plans |
.6 * Rate = Total |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 2 |
Completed parts of the journal without much thought |
Some effort in filling out the form, but strengths, action plans and insights sketchy |
Some insights and developed general action plans, not real effective in assessing results and using insights |
Attempt to follow through on action plan, reported some results and took some action on new understandings from insights |
Followed through with action plans, analyzed results and utilized insights to create new self-growth action plans |
.9 * Rate = Total |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 3 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
.9 * Rate = Total |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 4 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
.9 * Rate = Total |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 5 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
.9 * Rate = Total |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 6 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
.9 * Rate = Total |
|
Weekly Self-Assessment Journal 7 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
Same basis as Journal 2 |
.9 * Rate = Total |