| |
|
In an exceptional case, Illinois child protection
authorities have taken a 6-year-old boy from the custody of a Champaign
mother because she was still breastfeeding him, allegedly against his
wishes.
In the view of the mother fighting for the return of her only child, the
battle pits American norms about parenting against her right to raise
her son as she sees fit--a style that includes allowing the boy to choose
when he quits nursing.
To state child welfare officials, the case is about abuse.
Authorities at the Department of Children and Family Services took the
boy from the 32-year-old woman's home after a baby-sitter called an abuse
hotline and the child subsequently told investigators that he no longer
wanted to breastfeed, they said. The mother says she told investigators
her son never indicated he didn't want to nurse and that she would continue
to breastfeed as long as her son wished.
The agency has determined that the child's living situation constitutes
sexual molestation and risk of harm.
"Breastfeeding a child is not the issue," says Deborah Kennedy,
DCFS regional administrator in the central region. "It's after he
has stated that it is unwanted and she had that information and didn't
indicate she would halt that activity ... then you have unwanted behavior
on his part and that constitutes abuse."
She added: "In general, any contact between
a sexual organ against the will of the child constitutes abuse ... because
it's breastfeeding, it's a sensitive issue."
On Monday, final arguments are scheduled in the family court case in Champaign
County, which alleges emotional harm to the boy. The case is to determine
whether the boy was neglected or abused and whether he should return home
to his mother.
The mother says the misguided case is based on society's narrow ideas
about what constitutes good parenting.
Research shows that while rare, it is not unheard of for a child to be
nursing at 6. Indeed, some pediatricians and child-rearing experts have
come to espouse a revival of old parenting practices, such as extended
breastfeeding and sleeping in the same bed with children--what some call
"co-sleeping." DCFS has said that co-sleeping was a factor in
its decision to take the child from the home. DCFS investigators say the
woman slept naked with the boy, which she denies.
"They are saying because you're not practicing Dr. Spock American-style
parenting, you're a bad mom," says the petite, feisty woman who was
born on a farm in Downstate Illinois. "What about all those places
in the world where the family sleeps in one room and that is co-sleeping
and you're telling me all those people are maladjusted? It's cultural
bias.
"My son would come to me and ask to nurse," says the woman.
"It's not sexual. It was a closeness thing. When he's ready for it,
he will ask to end breastfeeding."
A complete understanding of the case is elusive, in part because not all
the testimony and evidence is public. The judge in the Champaign County
case, Ann Einhorn, has refused to release any documents, and the state's
attorney as well as the lawyer representing the boy refuse to discuss
the case.
(The Tribune editorial standard is not to name juveniles in investigations
of sexual abuse, so the names of the child and the mother, who have the
same last name, have been withheld. In interviews, the mother did not
request anonymity.)
The woman is the oldest of nine children in a family that she says practiced
co-sleeping. Her current home is a two-bedroom, second-floor apartment,
cluttered with mounds of clothes, toys, newspapers and boxes of food through
which narrow pathways have been carved. Hoping her son will be home for
Christmas, she has purchased about a dozen presents--a scooter, a book,
the game Battleship--which sit stacked on the stairs.
The mother works part time at a liquor store and takes continuing education
classes. She never married the child's father, who now lives in Oregon
and only recently has instigated contact with the boy. He did not return
phone calls from the Tribune.
The mother says she practices child-led weaning, which is supported by
the Schaumburg-based breastfeeding advocacy organization, La Leche League
International, and allows the child to determine when he or she is done
nursing.
"My child was weaning himself," she says, "he was nursing
for 10 minutes a day and on weekends a little more. I don't think DCFS
has any right to be involved in this decision between me and my child."
Natural or the norm?
DCFS documents given to the Tribune by the mother indicate that the boy
told a child protection investigator that he no longer wanted to nurse
and had told his mom that; the mother says her son has never communicated
that to her.
The documents also indicate that the boy told the investigator that he
still shared a bed with his mother and "sometimes when she does not
have clean clothes, she sleeps naked."
The boy told the investigator that he always slept in clothes.
In an interview, the mother says she has not slept with him naked since
he was around age 3, when she stopped because her son commented that she
should put some clothes on. Though she has since moved, the mother says
her son did not have his own room or his own bed in their former three-bedroom
apartment.
Her parenting style and the way she was raised bring to the fore areas
of child-rearing that many of today's parents keep private because they
are not seen as widely acceptable in society, experts say. While no researcher
supports forcing a child to nurse or co-sleeping naked if that creates
discomfort for a child, they also say that co-sleeping and extended nursing
are both perfectly natural--it is society that makes them seem unnatural.
Research shows that many women continue to nurse their children well beyond
infancy.
Katherine Dettwyler, an associate professor of anthropology and nutrition
at Texas A&M University, conducted a study in the late 1990s on 1,280
children whose parents self-reported information about their breastfeeding
practices. Of the total, 375 children were still nursing at age 4, 212
children were nursing at age 5, and 67 children were nursing at age 6,
according to Dettwyler.
Elizabeth Baldwin, a Miami-based attorney who specializes in breastfeeding
cases and is an adviser to La Leche League International, says "there
is nothing wrong with breastfeeding at age 6."
"You cannot make a child nurse; either the child has the need or
does not have the need," Baldwin said. "We have sexualized the
breast to the point where we assume that it is a sexual thing rather than
a tool for nursing."
Extended breastfeeding and co-sleeping often go hand-in-hand, experts
say. "Other countries wouldn't even know there was a question to
be asked about where should my baby sleep," said James McKenna, a
professor of anthropology and the director of a mother-baby behavioral
sleep lab at the University of Notre Dame. "It is a recent Western
concept engrained in us, an emphasis on individualism and the idea that
it's a moral principle that early in life babies and children need to
soothe themselves."
McKenna added: "In our society, we equate nudity with the potential
for sexuality. It may not be a sexual act at all in the minds of participants;
it is externally influenced viewpoints that make it so."
He warned, however, that not all co-sleeping arrangements are necessarily
healthy.
"The benefit of any kind of social behavior is determined by the
context in which it occurs," McKenna said. "In a healthy human
family, sleeping arrangements can enhance that which is already good,
or it could be the case sleeping arrangements can enhance that which is
already bad."
Focus on boy's reaction
The Champaign case is similar to--but also critically different from--a
celebrated case out of New York state in 1991. In that case Denise Periggo's
3-year-old daughter Cherlyn was taken from her because Periggo had strong
feelings of sexual arousal when breastfeeding.
In the Champaign case, experts are divided on how the nursing was affecting
the boy.
A report by Champaign forensic psychologist Dr. Marty Traver,who evaluated
the boy upon referral from Judge Einhorn, described an alert, relaxed
child who expressed ambivalence about nursing.
"It is clear that [the boy] has suffered some emotional problems
as a result of his extended nursing," Traver wrote. "Those problems
however do not appear to rise to the level of abuse unless there is evidence
that [the boy's] mother nursed him for her own gratification."
"The primary detriment from extended nursing in this case, was that
[the boy] was ashamed of doing so and did not feel socially appropriate
in doing so," Traver's report states.
"A parent must weigh the damage done by participating in something
society does not approve of against the positive effects and advantages
of continuing to do so. In this case, as in many others, the parent and
child had to keep the continuing breastfeeding a secret because of societal
disapproval. This sets the child up to keep other secrets that he cannot
yet understand," the report stated.
Traver also said it was not appropriate for the boy to continue to sleep
with his mother. "At this age, it would be psychologically harmful
for him to be in his mother's presence when she is nude. ... (The boy)
must learn to sleep in his own bed and soothe himself to sleep."
But a report by Kate McDougall, a Catholic Social Service social worker
who is counseling the mother and child, concluded that while the mother's
"parenting style may be considered somewhat permissive, this therapist
does not have concerns about [the boy's] safety while in her care."
McDougall added that she saw no evidence of any abuse in the relationship.
The boy "has come to feel ashamed and guilty about breastfeeding
as a result of his being removed from his mother's care due to their nursing.
This therapist has concerns that these feelings of shame and guilt will
be exacerbated by further separation," McDougall wrote in a clinical
assessment report.
McDougall also stated in her report that she had no concerns about the
two sleeping in the same bed and recommended the boy be returned home.
The woman's public defender, David DeThorne, said Traver's testimony statedthat
the child was embarrassed.
"That shouldn't be a reason the state should get involved,"
DeThorne said.
"She was doing something to him outside the norm, and [perhaps] he
didn't want to--that is open to dispute as well."
He added: "Parents should be allowed to make decisions that might
be out of the norm. Most parents don't breastfeed at age of 6, but it
doesn't mean it's wrong for the child."
Countered DCFS spokeswoman Martha Allen: "There is a problem when
the mother is sleeping naked with a 6-year-old; we live in America and
we have our
norms too.
"This is a case that not just DCFS but the state's attorney and judge
determined was inappropriate and was a form of abuse. "It's inappropriate
for a mother to be breastfeeding a child at 6 years old and to be sleeping
naked with him. The reason DCFS found it an issue was we're looking at
the area of sexual abuse when we say molestation. There is risk of actual
and emotional abuse. We are in the realm of sexual abuse; that is the
reason that we took the child out of the mother's care."
On Monday, Judge Einhorn will hear final arguments from both sides in
the Champaign County case. Einhorn may decide on Monday, or she could
wait until a later date, to determine whether the boy was neglected or
abused. If her determination is that the child was abused, another hearing
will be held to decide whether the child can go home or not, and to determine
a plan for the mother to get her son back.
Though she wants her son back, the mother also refuses to compromise her
methods. "They took my son because I'm not following the DCFS cookbook
on raising a kid," she says. "It's so outrageous, they need
to admit they made a mistake and drop it."
Captions: PHOTO: `My son would come to
me and ask to nurse. It's not sexual. It was a closeness thing.'
The mother in the DCFS custody case.
Tribune photo by Phil Velasquez.
Tag: 0012100509
Keywords:
PARENT CHILD SEX ABUSE FOOD ISSUE WOMAN
RESEARCH HISTORY COURT BEHAVIOR
Top
|