1. Language and Students with
E/BD
Laura A. Getty,
CCC-SLP
2. What we know….
nVery
little research on students with E/BD and language
nStudents
with E/BD appear to have communication difficulties such as…..
nCollaborative
approach between teachers and SLP could help students with E/BD
3. What we want to know….
nDo
students with E/BD have tend to have communication problems?
nIs
so, what type of communication problems?
nWhen,
how, and where do we diagnose and treat those areas of concern?
4. Review….
nCommunication
nLanguage
nSpeech
nPragmatics
5.
nChildren
with E/BD exhibit language problems
nPragmatic
in nature
nUnderstanding
the purposes of communication
nEstablishing
and maintaining topics
nType
of information to be shared
nHow
much information is shared
nWho,
what, where, when, why
6.
n
Result of poor pragmatics….
n
Social interactions
n
Initiate relationships
n
Develop relationships
n
Maintain relationships
7. What the research says…
n
Gallagher (1999) –aggressive children used less
verbal communication and more physical actions
n
Fujiki, Brinton, Morgan & Hart
(1999)-children with non-compliance tendencies may have receptive language
deficits that limit ability to comply
8.
n
Ruhl, Hughes, and Camarata (1992)--reported
children misinterpret communication, become frustrated, and develop antisocial
behavior
n
Rogers-Adkinson (2003)
n
--reported children with ED/LA have difficulty
with abstract language
n
language processing in children with ED
contributes to language delays
9.
n
Benner, Nelson, and Epstein (2002) found …
n
71% of children with E/BD had significant
language deficits
n
71% had pragmatic problems
n
64% had expressive difficulties
n
56% had receptive deficits
10.
n
Benner, Nelson, and Epstein (2002) noted the
following of students with E/BD after a review of the literature
n
1. Students with language deficits (especially
comprehension problems) had a higher risk for antisocial behavior.
n
Children with E/BD tended to have high
comorbidity rates of antisocial behavior and language deficits.
11.
n
2. Students with receptive language deficits
have higher rates of behavior problems than do children with expressive
language deficits.
n
Children with E/BD in public schools (9 out of
10) have higher rates of receptive and expressive language disorders
§ as
compared to…
n
2 out of 3 children with E/BD in clinical
settings experienced language deficits
12.
n
3. An estimate of concomitant language deficits
in children with E/BD is 10 times greater than the general population
n
..although we don’t know the strength of the
relationship
n
Children with language deficits may have
underlying cognitive processing delays (Torgeson, 1998)
§ Memory
§ Attention
§ Visual
perception
§ Auditory
comprehension
§ …All
of which precede language development
13.
n
4. Language disorders appear to have a devastating
effect on interpersonal relationships.
n
Language performance tasks are based on five
basic components
§ phonologic
§ morphologic
§ syntactic
§ semantic
§ pragmatic
n
All are affected by reciprocal interaction--find
breakdowns early-->prescribe interventions
14.
n
5.
Question of external validity
n
There
was limited information known about the participants in the study.
n
Ethnicity?
n
SES?
n
Most children in the studies received services
in speech clinics, psychiatric facilities, and residential treatment facilities
(n=2,358)
15.
n
Implications
of Benner et al. review …
n
language
deficits may contribute to problematic interactions and academic failure
n
children
should be screened for language deficits
n
early
interventions and support programs for students with E/BD should address
language
n
need
to take a proactive/preventative approach
16.
Comorbidity
n
Tends
to be a relationship between children with E/BD and language difficulties
n
(prevalence rates = 20%-65%)
n
Cantwell
and Baker (1991) found comorbidity between language deficits and E/BD increased
over time.
n
Beichman,
Cantwell, Forness, Kavale, & Kaufmann (1998) found that comorbidity between language deficits and E/BD were
stable over time and across the years.
17. Comorbidity
n
Not certain of the nature
n
Not certain of the extent
n
Scores on language tests
n
Informal communication
n
Language difficulties may be masked
n
Language difficulties unidentified
18. Where do we go from here?
nQuestion
whether students with E/BD have language deficits
nObserve
language difficulties--formally and informally
nDiscuss
findings with other professionals
nDocument
findings
nMake
a referral
19.
n
Work collaboratively……
n
Who?
n
How?
n
Where?
n
When?
20. Interventions
n
Develop expressive language skills
n
Develop receptive skills
n
Teach pragmatics
21. Questions
n
Questions or comments?