| In
my first year of teaching, a student in an undergraduate research
course asked whether I considered myself a social worker or a researcher?
I answered without hesitation to say, "I am a social worker who
conducts research and teaches." My response not only appeased
the student's query, it also helped define me as an academic at the
start of my career. Now, ten years later I continue to view the academy
through the eyes of the social work profession, and I think of scholarship
and teaching as means to improve social work programs and services
for the benefit of our profession's clients or consumers.
In sum, I rely
on five major principles to guide my teaching activity. First, I
believe that learning the knowledge and skills of social work necessarily
takes place within the context of social work as a profession and
its associated values (e.g. NASW Code of Ethics). Second, I know
that individuals learn in various ways and am open to using diverse
teaching methods as long as there is evidence of student learning.
Third, I believe that learning is enhanced when students speak about
the concepts that are being taught, and as such encourage class
discussion. Fourth, I believe that technological skills are an asset
to social work practitioners and administrators. Finally, I believe
that learning is enhanced by a positive, dynamic, and fun environment,
as well as by providing relevant content and clear expectations.
The theoretical
foundation for my teaching approach fits best with Bandura's social
learning theory but is also guided by Bloom's taxonomy and the idea
that learning occurs in successive phases. In sum, these two theoretical
frameworks suggest that students must first add new knowledge to
their existing repertoire. As a second step in the learning process,
the newly acquired knowledge is then organized (or in some cases
re-organized) to form new conceptual schema so that students may
comprehend broader understanding and higher levels of learning.
Third, fine tuning must occur to help students apply knowledge to
a specific tasks, and this effort often involves repetition or practice.
After students have mastered application, a fourth step in learning
involves the deconstruction of new ideas and skills, and examining
the various component parts. Fifth, the parts are reconstructed
to create a new whole, or generate new ideas. Finally, the last
stage of learning involves evaluation of the knowledge and ideas.
This hierarchical model of learning assumes knowledge exists in
one's memory before new conceptual schema or knowledge adjustment
can happen. This framework is particularly useful for teaching policy
and research in social work given that the majority of students
have little to no background or experience in these topics. This
model also has utility for assisting students in understanding that
learning new concepts is an essential first step in knowledge building
for the social work practitioner. This understanding may alleviate
anxiety that sometimes results when students find the pace of learning
research or policy is "incongruent" with the pace of learning
in other courses, such as those in the practice portion of the curriculum.
The pace of learning in research tends to be particularly slower
and more cumbersome (especially at first) since students tend to
struggle with both a new vocabulary and a new (and sometimes foreign)
logic. However, the learning curve for most students seems to have
a j-shape; that is, learning seems slow to start but once
the basics are mastered, learning occurs at an accelerated rate.
So... to my students I say....hang in there, it only gets better!
|